Looking for an honest Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony comes out ahead 62/100 to 57/100 — a 5-point gap. The widest gap is in camera quality, where the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue undercuts the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony by 193% ($128 vs $374.99), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 93 vs 62), scoring 62 vs 57. If you want the better overall smartphones, Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony is the recommended choice.
Picking Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony over Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue means trading these off.
$375
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink PeonyW | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.3" | 6.5"✓ |
| Display Type | Actua OLED | — |
| Resolution | 2424 x 1080 pixels | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | 2700nits | — |
| HDR | HDR10+ | — |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Exynos 1280 |
| CPU | Octa-core 3.1 GHz | — |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB✓ |
| Storage Options | 128GB, 256GB | — |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Aperture | f/1.68 | — |
| OIS | Yes | — |
| Video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front Camera | 10.5MP | — |
| Battery | 4700mAh | 5000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 23W✓ | 15W |
| Wireless Charging | 21W | — |
| OS | Android 15 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 | — |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | — |
| Biometrics | Under-display fingerprint + Face unlock | — |
| Dimensions | 152.7 x 72.0 x 8.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 198g✓ | 205g |
| Price | 374.99$ | 128$✓ |
Buy Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony if…
Buy the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony if you want the best camera quality in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue if…
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony narrowly beats the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue in the smartphones category, especially in camera (camera score 93 vs 62), scoring 62 vs 57. If you want the better overall smartphones, Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony is the recommended choice.
Yes, Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony scores higher overall (62 vs 82).
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue is cheaper at $128 vs $374.99 for the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony.
Buy the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony if you want the best camera quality in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 4,700mAh for the Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 6.5'' - Blue has the larger display (6.5" vs 6.3").
Google Pixel 9 (6.3-in) - Pink Peony is lighter at 198g vs 205g.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 31, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
