Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o1
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIGoogle Gemini 1.5 Pro edges out the OpenAI o1 in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 7.0/10 vs 5.8/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is the clear pick.
4 Reasons Why Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Is Better
- 1.Better display rating: 3.2 vs 0.7
- 2.Better battery score: 10.0 vs 1.9
- 3.Better value score: 9.4 vs 2.5
- 4.Higher overall score: 7.0/10 vs 5.8/10
Spezifikationsvergleich
Google Gemini 1.5 ProOpenAI o1
Bewertungsaufschlüsselung
Google Gemini 1.5 ProOpenAI o1
9.4
Cost Efficiency20% weight
2.5Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Gewinner
7.4
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
9.2OpenAI o1 Gewinner
5.1
Arena ELO20% weight
7.5OpenAI o1 Gewinner
10.0
Context Window10% weight
1.9Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Gewinner
3.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
0.7Google Gemini 1.5 Pro Gewinner
6.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.1OpenAI o1 Gewinner
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
Gewinner✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Superior battery life
- ●Better value for money
✗ Cons
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
OpenAI o1
✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price tag
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower display score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$1.25/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$5.00/1M | $60.00/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
1.5 Pro1M
OpenAI o1200K
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓100,000 tok |
| Speed | ✓110 tok/s | 40 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | ✓700ms | 5.0s |
| Languages | 40+ | ✓50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
MMLU (Knowledge)
85.9|92.3
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
HumanEval (Coding)
84.1|92.4
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
MATH (Mathematics)
67.7|83.3
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
46.2|78.3
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
Chatbot Arena ELO
1287.0|1352.0
1.5 Pro
OpenAI o1
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | 1.5 Pro | OpenAI o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-11 | 2023-10 |
| Best For | long contextdocument analysisvideogeneral | reasoningmathsciencecomplex coding |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
Buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy OpenAI o1 if…
The OpenAI o1 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o1 — FAQ
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs OpenAI o1: which is better?
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro edges out the OpenAI o1 in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 7.0/10 vs 5.8/10. If you want the better overall performer, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is the clear pick.
Is Google Gemini 1.5 Pro better than OpenAI o1?
Yes, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro scores higher overall (8.9 vs 9.3).
Which is cheaper, Google Gemini 1.5 Pro or OpenAI o1?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Buy the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if you want the best overall value in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the OpenAI o1?
The OpenAI o1 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
