Looking for an honest Google Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Meta Llama 4 Scout comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Meta Llama 4 Scout comes out ahead 70/100 to 77/100 — a 7-point gap. The widest gap is in design and build, where the Meta Llama 4 Scout pulls noticeably ahead.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Meta Llama 4 Scout narrowly beats the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 77 vs 70. If you want the better overall ai language models, Meta Llama 4 Scout is the recommended choice.
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | $1.25/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Output (Completion) | $5.00/1M | ✓Free/1M |
| Open Source | Proprietary | ✓ Free |
Context Window (tokens)
| Metric | 1.5 Pro | 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 8,192 tok | ✓16,384 tok |
| Speed | 110 tok/s | ✓120 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 700ms | ✓600ms |
| Languages | ✓40+ | 12+ |
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
1.5 Pro
4 Scout
1.5 Pro
4 Scout
1.5 Pro
4 Scout
1.5 Pro
4 Scout
1.5 Pro
4 Scout
| Feature | 1.5 Pro | 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✕ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✓ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✕ | ✓ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✕ | ✓ |
| Field | 1.5 Pro | 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Parameters | — | 109B (17B active) |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2023-11 | 2025-03 |
| License | Commercial | Llama 4 Community |
| Best For | long contextdocument analysisvideogeneral | ultra long contextopen sourcemultimodaldocument analysis |
Buy Google Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Meta Llama 4 Scout if…
Buy the Meta Llama 4 Scout if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Meta Llama 4 Scout narrowly beats the Google Gemini 1.5 Pro in the ai language models category, especially in design, scoring 77 vs 70. If you want the better overall ai language models, Meta Llama 4 Scout is the recommended choice.
No, Meta Llama 4 Scout scores higher (75 vs 75).
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
The Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Meta Llama 4 Scout if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.