DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI o3-mini
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the OpenAI o3-mini in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.6/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
3 Reasons Why DeepSeek R1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 8.8 vs 7.7
- 2.Higher design rating: 7.7 vs 5.7
- 3.Higher overall score: 7.1/10 vs 6.6/10
Spezifikationsvergleich
DeepSeek R1OpenAI o3-mini
Bewertungsaufschlüsselung
DeepSeek R1OpenAI o3-mini
9.7
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.4Unentschieden
8.8
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.7DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
7.7
Arena ELO20% weight
5.7DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.9OpenAI o3-mini Gewinner
0.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.1OpenAI o3-mini Gewinner
8.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
8.2Unentschieden
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek R1
Gewinner✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Shorter battery life
- ●Lower display score
OpenAI o3-mini
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
- ●Superior battery life
✗ Cons
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.55/1M | $1.10/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$2.19/1M | $4.40/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek R1128K
OpenAI o3-mini200K
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | 32,768 tok | ✓100,000 tok |
| Speed | 25 tok/s | ✓80 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 3.0s | ✓2.0s |
| Languages | 20+ | ✓50+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
MMLU (Knowledge)
90.8|86.9
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
HumanEval (Coding)
92.6|92.9
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
MATH (Mathematics)
97.3|87.3
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
71.5|76.7
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
Chatbot Arena ELO
1358.0|1305.0
DeepSeek R1
OpenAI o3-mini
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | — |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | 2023-10 |
| License | MIT | Commercial |
| Best For | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency | reasoningcodingmathcost efficiency |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy OpenAI o3-mini if…
The OpenAI o3-mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI o3-mini — FAQ
DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI o3-mini: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the OpenAI o3-mini in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.6/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Is DeepSeek R1 better than OpenAI o3-mini?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 scores higher overall (9.2 vs 8.9).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or OpenAI o3-mini?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the OpenAI o3-mini?
The OpenAI o3-mini is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
