DeepSeek R1 vs xAI Grok 2
AI Matrix
Powered by Claude AIDeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the xAI Grok 2 in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.3/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
5 Reasons Why DeepSeek R1 Is Better
- 1.Better performance score: 8.8 vs 7.9
- 2.Higher camera score: 8.1 vs 7.1
- 3.Higher design rating: 7.7 vs 5.2
- 4.Better value score: 9.7 vs 9.0
- 5.Higher overall score: 7.1/10 vs 6.3/10
Spezifikationsvergleich
DeepSeek R1xAI Grok 2
Bewertungsaufschlüsselung
DeepSeek R1xAI Grok 2
9.7
Cost Efficiency20% weight
9.0DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
8.8
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.9DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
7.7
Arena ELO20% weight
5.2DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
1.2
Context Window10% weight
1.2Unentschieden
0.2
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
2.9xAI Grok 2 Gewinner
8.1
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
7.1DeepSeek R1 Gewinner
Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
DeepSeek R1
Gewinner✓ Pros
- ●Strong performance score
- ●Higher camera score
- ●Better build and design
✗ Cons
- ●Lower display score
xAI Grok 2
✓ Pros
- ●Better display quality
✗ Cons
- ●Higher price tag
- ●Lower camera score
- ●Lower performance score
💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | Grok 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input (Prompt) | ✓$0.55/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output (Completion) | ✓$2.19/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Open Source | ✓ Free | Proprietary |
⚡ Context Window & Speed
Context Window (tokens)
DeepSeek R1128K
Grok 2131K
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | Grok 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Output | ✓32,768 tok | 4,096 tok |
| Speed | 25 tok/s | ✓100 tok/s |
| Time to First Token | 3.0s | ✓600ms |
| Languages | 20+ | ✓25+ |
📊 Benchmark Scores
Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
MMLU (Knowledge)
90.8|87.5
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
HumanEval (Coding)
92.6|88.4
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
MATH (Mathematics)
97.3|76.1
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
GPQA (Expert Q&A)
71.5|56.0
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
Chatbot Arena ELO
1358.0|1290.0
DeepSeek R1
Grok 2
🔧 Capabilities
| Feature | DeepSeek R1 | Grok 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought | ✓ | ✕ |
| Vision (Image Input) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Audio Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Video Input | ✕ | ✕ |
| Image/Audio Output | ✕ | ✕ |
| Function Calling / Tools | ✕ | ✓ |
| JSON Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-time Web Access | ✕ | ✓ |
| Fine-tuning Support | ✓ | ✕ |
| Batch API | ✓ | ✕ |
| Streaming | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✕ |
ℹ️ Model Details
| Field | DeepSeek R1 | Grok 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | — |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2024-07 | real-time |
| License | MIT | Commercial |
| Best For | reasoningmathscienceopen sourcecost efficiency | current eventsresearchreal time infogeneral |
Wer sollte kaufen
Buy DeepSeek R1 if…
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Buy xAI Grok 2 if…
The xAI Grok 2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Community Vote
Who do you think wins this matchup?
DeepSeek R1 vs xAI Grok 2 — FAQ
DeepSeek R1 vs xAI Grok 2: which is better?
DeepSeek R1 narrowly beats the xAI Grok 2 in the ai language models category, particularly in design, scoring 7.1/10 vs 6.3/10. If you want the better overall performer, DeepSeek R1 is the clear pick.
Is DeepSeek R1 better than xAI Grok 2?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 scores higher overall (9.2 vs 8.5).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or xAI Grok 2?
Check the latest prices using the buy links above.
Who should buy the DeepSeek R1?
Buy the DeepSeek R1 if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Who should buy the xAI Grok 2?
The xAI Grok 2 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
