Cohere Command R vs Google Gemma 3 27B

Name: Cohere Command R
Brand: Cohere
SKU: cohere-command-r

Looking for an honest Cohere Command R vs Google Gemma 3 27B comparison in 2026? We scored both ai language models on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Google Gemma 3 27B comes out ahead 36/100 to 52/100 — a 16-point gap. The widest gap is in performance, where the Google Gemma 3 27B pulls noticeably ahead.

Cohere

Command R

Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more

AI Matrix

Google Gemma 3 27B clearly outperforms the Cohere Command R in the ai language models category, especially in performance, scoring 52 vs 36. If you want the better overall ai language models, Google Gemma 3 27B is the recommended choice.

Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team|Our methodology

4 Reasons Why Google Gemma 3 27B Is Better

1.Better performance score: 60 vs 23
2.Higher camera score: 48 vs 38
3.Higher design rating: 28 vs 0
4.Higher overall score: 52 vs 36

Punktaufteilung

Cohere Command RGoogle Gemma 3 27B

Cost Efficiency20% weight

100

Unentschieden

Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight

Google Gemma 3 27B Gewinner

Arena ELO20% weight

Google Gemma 3 27B Gewinner

Context Window10% weight

Unentschieden

Speed (tok/s)10% weight

Cohere Command R Gewinner

Coding (HumanEval)10% weight

Google Gemma 3 27B Gewinner

Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.

Cohere Command R

✓ Pros

●Better display score

✗ Cons

●Lower camera score
●Lower performance score

Google Gemma 3 27B

Gewinner

✓ Pros

●Higher performance score
●Better camera score
●Better design score

✗ Cons

●Lower display score

💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.

Metric	Command R	3 27B
Input (Prompt)	$0.15/1M	✓Free/1M
Output (Completion)	$0.60/1M	✓Free/1M
Open Source	Proprietary	✓ Free

⚡ Context Window & Speed

Context Window (tokens)

Command R128K

3 27B128K

Metric	Command R	3 27B
Max Output	4,096 tok	✓8,192 tok
Speed	✓150 tok/s	80 tok/s
Time to First Token	400ms	400ms
Languages	10+	✓35+

📊 Benchmark Scores

Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.

Command R

3 27B

MMLU (Knowledge)

68.2|81.0

Command R

3 27B

HumanEval (Coding)

75.0|79.0

Command R

3 27B

MATH (Mathematics)

45.0|68.0

Command R

3 27B

GPQA (Expert Q&A)

30.0|42.0

Command R

3 27B

Chatbot Arena ELO

1147.0|1225.0

Command R

3 27B

🔧 Capabilities

Feature	Command R	3 27B
Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought	✕	✕
Vision (Image Input)	✕	✓
Audio Input	✕	✕
Video Input	✕	✕
Image/Audio Output	✕	✕
Function Calling / Tools	✓	✕
JSON Mode	✓	✓
Real-time Web Access	✕	✕
Fine-tuning Support	✓	✓
Batch API	✓	✕
Streaming	✓	✓
RAG Optimized	✓	—
Open Source	✕	✓

ℹ️ Model Details

Field	Command R	3 27B
Provider	Cohere	Google
Parameters	35B	27B
Knowledge Cutoff	2024-03	2024-06
License	Commercial	Gemma
Best For	RAGenterprise searchcitationscost efficiency	open sourceself hostingedge deploymentmultimodal

Wer sollte kaufen

Buy Cohere Command R if…

The Cohere Command R is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Buy Google Gemma 3 27B if…

Buy the Google Gemma 3 27B if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.