VersusMatrix

Mobile Devices

SmartphonesTabletsSmartwatchesFitness TrackersEarbudsE-Readers

Computers & Monitors

LaptopsGaming LaptopsMonitorsGaming MonitorsPrintersPower BanksNAS Storage

PC Components

Graphics CardsProcessorsSSD StorageRAM MemoryCPU CoolersPower SuppliesPC Cases

Audio

HeadphonesBluetooth SpeakersGaming HeadsetsSmart Speakers

Photo, Video & TV

CamerasDronesProjectorsTelevisionsSecurity Cameras

Gaming

Game ConsolesGaming ControllersVR HeadsetsGaming MiceGaming KeyboardsGaming Chairs

Home & Kitchen

Robot VacuumsVacuum CleanersAir PurifiersAir FryersCoffee MakersEspresso MachinesSmart ThermostatsSmart LocksDishwashersWashing MachinesRefrigerators

Personal Care

Electric ShaversElectric ToothbrushesHair DryersHair StraightenersSunglasses

Sports & Outdoor

Running ShoesSneakersTreadmillsExercise BikesElectric Scooters

AI & Software

AI Language Models
SmartphonesLaptopsGraphics CardsHeadphonesProcessorsBlog
VersusMatrix

AI-powered comparisons for smarter buying decisions.

Company

  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • About
  • Contact
  • Sitemap

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
  • Editorial Guidelines

Categories

Mobile

  • Smartphones
  • Tablets
  • Smartwatches
  • Fitness Trackers
  • Earbuds
  • E-Readers

Computers

  • Laptops
  • Gaming Laptops
  • Monitors
  • Gaming Monitors
  • Printers
  • Power Banks
  • NAS Storage

PC Components

  • Graphics Cards
  • Processors
  • SSD Storage
  • RAM Memory
  • CPU Coolers
  • Power Supplies
  • PC Cases

Audio

  • Headphones
  • Bluetooth Speakers
  • Gaming Headsets
  • Smart Speakers

Photo & TV

  • Cameras
  • Drones
  • Projectors
  • Televisions
  • Security Cameras

Gaming

  • Game Consoles
  • Gaming Controllers
  • VR Headsets
  • Gaming Mice
  • Gaming Keyboards
  • Gaming Chairs

Home & Kitchen

  • Robot Vacuums
  • Vacuum Cleaners
  • Air Purifiers
  • Air Fryers
  • Coffee Makers
  • Espresso Machines
  • Smart Thermostats
  • Smart Locks
  • Dishwashers
  • Washing Machines
  • Refrigerators

Personal Care

  • Electric Shavers
  • Electric Toothbrushes
  • Hair Dryers
  • Hair Straighteners
  • Sunglasses

Sports & Outdoor

  • Running Shoes
  • Sneakers
  • Treadmills
  • Exercise Bikes
  • Electric Scooters

AI & Software

  • AI Language Models

© 2026 VersusMatrix. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /AI Language Models
  3. /Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Microsoft Phi-4

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Microsoft Phi-4

GEWINNER
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

6.5
6.5/10
Try Free →API Docs →
Microsoft Phi-4

Microsoft

Phi-4

6.0
6.0/10
Try Free →API Docs →

AI Matrix

Powered by Claude AI

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku narrowly beats the Microsoft Phi-4 in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 6.5/10 vs 6.0/10. If you want the better overall performer, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is the clear pick.

Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team|Our methodology

5 Reasons Why Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Is Better

  • 1.Better performance score: 7.7 vs 7.1
  • 2.Higher camera score: 7.0 vs 5.6
  • 3.Better battery score: 1.9 vs 0.1
  • 4.Higher design rating: 3.9 vs 2.3
  • 5.Higher overall score: 6.5/10 vs 6.0/10

Spezifikationsvergleich

Cost Efficiency9.6 / 10.0Benchmark (MMLU)7.7 / 7.1Arena ELO3.9 / 2.3Context Window1.9 / 0.1Speed (tok/s)5.7 / 8.2Coding (HumanEval)7.0 / 5.6
Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4

Bewertungsaufschlüsselung

Anthropic Claude 3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4
9.6
Cost Efficiency20% weight
10.0
Unentschieden
7.7
Benchmark (MMLU)30% weight
7.1
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Gewinner
3.9
Arena ELO20% weight
2.3
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Gewinner
1.9
Context Window10% weight
0.1
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Gewinner
5.7
Speed (tok/s)10% weight
8.2
Microsoft Phi-4 Gewinner
7.0
Coding (HumanEval)10% weight
5.6
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku Gewinner

Scores are relative within the ai language modelscategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku

Gewinner

✓ Pros

  • ●Strong performance score
  • ●Superior battery life
  • ●Higher camera score

✗ Cons

  • ●Lower display score

Microsoft Phi-4

✓ Pros

  • ●Better display quality

✗ Cons

  • ●Shorter battery life
  • ●Lower camera score
  • ●Lower performance score

💰 Token Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Lower cost = better value. Free = open-source self-hosted.

Metric3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4
Input (Prompt)$0.80/1M✓$0.07/1M
Output (Completion)$4.00/1M✓$0.26/1M
Open SourceProprietary✓ Free

⚡ Context Window & Speed

Context Window (tokens)

3.5 Haiku200K
Microsoft Phi-416K
Metric3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4
Max Output✓8,192 tok4,096 tok
Speed180 tok/s✓250 tok/s
Time to First Token350ms✓150ms
Languages✓50+15+

📊 Benchmark Scores

Higher is better. Industry-standard AI evaluation benchmarks.

3.5 Haiku
Microsoft Phi-4
MMLU (Knowledge)
87.1|84.8

3.5 Haiku

Microsoft Phi-4

HumanEval (Coding)
88.2|82.6

3.5 Haiku

Microsoft Phi-4

MATH (Mathematics)
69.2|80.4

3.5 Haiku

Microsoft Phi-4

GPQA (Expert Q&A)
41.6|56.1

3.5 Haiku

Microsoft Phi-4

Chatbot Arena ELO
1255.0|1213.0

3.5 Haiku

Microsoft Phi-4

🔧 Capabilities

Feature3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4
Reasoning / Chain-of-Thought✕✕
Vision (Image Input)✓✕
Audio Input✕✕
Video Input✕✕
Image/Audio Output✕✕
Function Calling / Tools✓✕
JSON Mode✓✓
Real-time Web Access✕✕
Fine-tuning Support✕✓
Batch API✓✓
Streaming✓✓
Open Source✕✓

ℹ️ Model Details

Field3.5 HaikuMicrosoft Phi-4
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Parameters—14B
Knowledge Cutoff2024-072024-06
LicenseCommercialMIT
Best For
fast taskshigh volumecost efficiencycoding
edge deploymentSTEMcost efficiencymathsmall footprint

Wer sollte kaufen

Buy Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

Buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.

Buy Microsoft Phi-4 if…

The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Community Vote

Who do you think wins this matchup?

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Microsoft Phi-4 — FAQ

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Microsoft Phi-4: which is better?

Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku narrowly beats the Microsoft Phi-4 in the ai language models category, particularly in battery, scoring 6.5/10 vs 6.0/10. If you want the better overall performer, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku is the clear pick.

Is Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Microsoft Phi-4?

Yes, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher overall (8.4 vs 8.2).

Which is cheaper, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku or Microsoft Phi-4?

Check the latest prices using the buy links above.

Who should buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku?

Buy the Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.

Who should buy the Microsoft Phi-4?

The Microsoft Phi-4 is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.

Ähnliche Vergleiche

OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
vs
Meta Llama 3.1 70B
Meta Llama 3.1 70B
OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
vs
Microsoft Phi-4
Microsoft Phi-4
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
OpenAI GPT-4o mini
vs
OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
vs
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
Google Gemini 1.5 Pro
Full Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku review →Full Microsoft Phi-4 review →All Anthropic AI Language Models →All Microsoft AI Language Models →