Looking for an honest Apple iPhone 17 Air vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very comes out ahead 58/100 to 87/100 — a 29-point gap. The widest gap is in camera quality, where the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very undercuts the Apple iPhone 17 Air by 22% ($735.95 vs $899), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Apple
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very clearly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Air in the smartphones category, especially in camera (200MP vs 48MP), scoring 87 vs 58. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very over Apple iPhone 17 Air means trading these off.
$899
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
| Spec | Apple iPhone 17 Air | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT VeryW |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.6" | 6.9"✓ |
| Display Type | OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | — | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | — | 2600nits |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| Protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Armor 2 |
| Chipset | Apple A19 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU | — | Octa-core 4.47 GHz |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB✓ |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB✓ |
| Storage Options | — | 256GB, 512GB, 1TB |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 200MP✓ |
| Aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| OIS | — | Yes |
| Video | — | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps |
| Front Camera | 24MP✓ | 12MP |
| Battery | 3400mAh | 5000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 25W | 45W✓ |
| Wireless Charging | — | 15W |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Biometrics | — | Under-display fingerprint |
| Dimensions | — | 162.8 x 77.6 x 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 145g✓ | 218g |
| Price | 899$ | 735.95$✓ |
Buy Apple iPhone 17 Air if…
The Apple iPhone 17 Air is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very clearly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Air in the smartphones category, especially in camera (200MP vs 48MP), scoring 87 vs 58. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very scores higher (80 vs 83).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very is cheaper at $735.95 vs $899 for the Apple iPhone 17 Air.
The Apple iPhone 17 Air is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 3,400mAh for the Apple iPhone 17 Air), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very has the larger display (6.9" vs 6.6").
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very has a higher-resolution main camera (200MP vs 48MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Apple iPhone 17 Air is lighter at 145g vs 218g.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ATT Very has more RAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 21, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.