Looking for an honest Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G comes out ahead 74/100 to 78/100 — a 4-point gap. The widest gap is in display, where the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim undercuts the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G by 73% ($748.99 vs $1,299), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G narrowly beats the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim in the smartphones category, especially in battery life (5,000mAh vs 3,726mAh), scoring 78 vs 74. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G over Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim means trading these off.
Apple
$749
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5GW |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.3" | 6.9"✓ |
| Display Type | OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | 2000nits | — |
| Chipset | Apple A19 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB✓ |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB✓ |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 200MP✓ |
| Front Camera | 24MP✓ | 12MP |
| Battery | 3726mAh | 5000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 25W | 45W✓ |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Weight | 170g✓ | 218g |
| Price | 748.99$ | 1299$ |
Buy Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim if…
Choose the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G narrowly beats the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim in the smartphones category, especially in battery life (5,000mAh vs 3,726mAh), scoring 78 vs 74. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G scores higher (78 vs 74).
Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim is cheaper at $748.99 vs $1299 for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G.
Choose the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim if budget is your top priority — it offers competitive specs at a lower price point.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 3,726mAh for the Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has the larger display (6.9" vs 6.3").
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has a higher-resolution main camera (200MP vs 48MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Apple iPhone 17 6.3" 5G Fully eSim is lighter at 170g vs 218g.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G has more RAM (12GB vs 8GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: May 10, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.