Looking for an honest Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) comparison in 2026? We scored both smartphones on the same six-dimension framework — performance, battery, display, camera, design and value — using identical methodology, so the numbers below are directly comparable. In our overall scoring the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) comes out ahead 52/100 to 58/100 — a 6-point gap. The widest gap is in camera quality, where the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max pulls noticeably ahead. On price the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) undercuts the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max by 50% ($199.99 vs $299), which materially changes the value calculus for budget-conscious buyers.

Apple
Prices may vary · We may earn a commission on purchases. Learn more
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) narrowly beats the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max in the smartphones category, especially in battery life (5,000mAh vs 3,687mAh), scoring 58 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is the recommended choice.
Picking Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) over Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max means trading these off.
Nichts Wesentliches — die Spezifikationen sind ungefähr gleich
$299
Scores are relative within the smartphonescategory. Percentages show each dimension's weight in the overall score. A difference of less than 0.5 points is considered a tie.
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
✓ Pros
✗ Cons
| Spec | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025)W |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" |
| Display Type | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | — | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz✓ |
| Brightness | 1200nits | — |
| Chipset | Apple A14 Bionic | Exynos 1380 |
| CPU | — | Octa-core 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G68 |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB✓ |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB✓ |
| Storage Options | — | 128GB, 256GB |
| Main Camera | 12MP | 50MP✓ |
| Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Video | — | 4K@30fps |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 32MP✓ |
| Battery | 3687mAh | 5000mAh✓ |
| Charging | 20W | 25W✓ |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 14 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Water Resistance | IP68 | — |
| Dimensions | — | 158.5 x 74.8 x 8.4 mm |
| Weight | 228g | 210g✓ |
| Colors | — | Black, White, Blue, Pink |
| Price | 299$ | 199.99$✓ |
Buy Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max if…
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if…
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) narrowly beats the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max in the smartphones category, especially in battery life (5,000mAh vs 3,687mAh), scoring 58 vs 52. If you want the better overall smartphones, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is the recommended choice.
No, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) scores higher (83 vs 77).
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is cheaper at $199.99 vs $299 for the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is worth considering if you prefer its specific design, ecosystem, or brand — though it scores lower overall in our comparison.
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) if you want the best performance in this comparison. It scores higher overall and is the recommended choice for most buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) has a larger battery (5,000mAh vs 3,687mAh for the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max), which generally means longer use between charges.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) has a higher-resolution main camera (50MP vs 12MP). Note that megapixels are one factor — sensor quality and processing also matter.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) is lighter at 210g vs 228g.
Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (2025) has more RAM (12GB vs 6GB), which helps with multitasking.
Reviewed by VersusMatrix Editorial Team
Last updated: June 1, 2026
Methodology: AI-powered analysis of technical specifications from manufacturer data. Scores are calculated by comparing products across multiple dimensions and normalized relative to the full category database. Our editorial process is independent and not influenced by affiliate partnerships.